Search for: "JOHN DOE, 2"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 13,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2021, 6:19 am
I'm only one hour into it, after 2 sessions. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 9:51 am
Does John Edwards currently engage FORGE Consulting, or any of its principals for structured settlements? [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:03 pm
Maybe I should drink more, but I cannot recall ever seeing beer and wine actually sold under the same mark.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
Does the fact that this particular sort of statutory violation would also result in an Appropriations Clause violation confer standing on the House that it otherwise wouldn’t have? [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 11:31 am
John Doe, 834 F.3d 723, 728 (6th Cir. 2016); Pet. 8a, 10a (7th Cir.); Cajune v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 11:07 pm
According to the Board, Applicant could have suspended its appeal and ask for remand to the Office if it wanted to challenge that evidence.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 12:15 pm
Does our impulse to help others start with a socialist impulse or any ideology? [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Chapter 2 “was titled ‘Threats, Insults, Blows, Attacks, Fights, Restraints, Nervous Shocks. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 5:14 am
John’s Mercy Health Sys. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:57 am
Maybe he was, maybe he wasn't. 2, That said, I see some ambiguities in Marshall's position. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 2:45 am
This case law stems from the Decisions handed down by the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal on 25 March 2015 in cases G 2/12 and G2/13, which are nicknamed, respectively, “Tomatoes-II” and “Broccoli-II,” to distinguish them from “Tomatoes-I” (G 1/08 )and “Broccoli-I” (G 2/07). [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 8:27 am
Instead, the analogy he saw was to Colorado Amendment 2, the measure struck down by the Supreme Court in Romer v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 3:05 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 3:13 am
[Sorry - had to give the Beatles equal time].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 3:35 am
So marks may be registered "under" Section 2(f) but they can't be refused under Section 2(f).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:30 am
But such oversight does not remotely resemble democratic control. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:35 am
Posted by John LewisIs the Supreme Court’s January 10th opinion in CompuCredit Corp v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 2:12 am
" I would have expected to see the term "soft drink beverages," or something like that, in a trademark application.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:58 am
SERIES: Bankruptcy and Distressed Property in a Domestic Relations MatterPart 1- How Bankruptcy Affects Distressed Property in Divorce or Dissolution: The Basics Part 2- What is an Automatic Stay and How Does it Affect Divorce? [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 6:08 pm
It affirmed a Section 2(e)(4) refusal to register, finding the mark to be primarily merely a surname. [read post]