Search for: "Jacob Rule" Results 2001 - 2020 of 3,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2010, 4:03 am
 Lord Justice Jacob, with whom Mr Justice Kitchin and Lord Justice Longmore noddingly concurred, said "31. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:17 am by Eugene Volokh
Jacobs further said that Gonzalez would not retract his statements and that Jacobs was receiving pressure from others to take action against her. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
BOX 115220CARROLLTON TX 75011Phone 214-234-8456Fax 214-234-8454 FIGELMAN, JACOB MMELAMED, MARC A.GUENTHER, KAREN ELAINA MOOREJAVITCH BLOCK, LLC 275 W. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:29 am by Broc Romanek
Writing for the Court en banc, Justice Jacobs acknowledged the legitimacy of these policy concerns but determined that a bright-line rule was inconsistent with the results reached in Disney, McKesson HBOC and CNET -- three cases which allowed § 220 inspections despite the plaintiff's prior initiation of derivative litigation. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
As was held by Owen J at paragraph 46 of Jacobs: “…the question under Art 4(3) is not whether the right to compensation is manifestly more connected to England and Wales, but whether the tort/delict has such a connection. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Symposium on Adam Cox and Cristina Rodriguez, The President and Immigration Law (Oxford University Press, 2020).Peter M. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am by Andy
I suggest that quoting a photograph (or indeed any artistic work) might be possible for the purposes of something akin to criticism or review, but it will continue to remain outside the fair dealing rules for news reporting.Then there is the reliance on a purported licence, such as creative commons, which may accompany an image found on, say, Flickr. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Wrongful Death: DOCTORS KILLED MAN TO HARVEST ORGANS, FAMILY SAYS, Jacobs v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Simon Lewis
Just as there is a rule that scuba divers operate in pairs to look out for each other, maybe machines should be paired with a human minder/beneficiary. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 9:47 am
But there is no reason to simply stop at these three Second Amendment rulings. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:22 pm by Jon Sands
Simpson, 439 F.3d at 492, 496; Brendlin, 195 P.3d at 1076-77, 1080; Jacobs v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Zettler, professor at the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, Jacob S. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:27 pm by Marcel Pemsel
It also seems unlikely that anyone believes Tommy Hilfiger or Marc Jacobs to design or even sign-off on all the goods sold under their marks. 3. [read post]