Search for: "Jones v. United States"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 3,760
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 12:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:34 am
A panel of the Washington Court of Appeals held in State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:21 pm
Relying on its prior decisions in United States Fid. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
Interestingly, the case was tried before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Atlantic Sounding Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:55 am
United States, 184 F.3d 556, 558 (6th Cir. 1999), that the rational of Rule 3(c)(4) applies equally to the requirement to name the court. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 4:53 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 2:48 pm
Antoine Jones. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:15 am
Texas Tort Claims Act 42 U.S.Code §1983 provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory … subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:08 am
820 A.2d 546, 547-48 (D.C. 2003)(citing United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
Between 1937 when the Court decided Jones and Laughlin Steel, and 1995, when the Court struck down the Gun Free School Zones Act in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:55 am
Even when courts venture outside the binaries, as the concurring justices did when addressing GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:27 am
First, it has long been the law in most of the United States that baseball spectators assume the risk of being hit by stray balls. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm
Slip op. at 4 N.1 (citing United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Further, the Association argued that even if the court considered time on land spent in service of the vessel, plaintiff still failed to meet the 30% threshold adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 3:55 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:13 am
Further, the court cited precedence where a person might reasonably infer that someone wearing a Confederate flag on their clothing might “harbor racial bias against African-Americans (United States v. [read post]
