Search for: "Laws v. Laws"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 269,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2009, 1:44 am
Regina v McQuoid Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Deliberate insider dealing was a species of fraud for which prosecution, rather than regulatory proceedings, would often be more appropriate. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:41 am
Orchard v Lee Court of Appeal “A child at school playing a game in an authorised play area who was not breaking any rules and who was not acting beyond the norms of the game was not liable for an injury caused to a playground supervisor. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:33 am
Doleman v Shaw Court of Appeal “When a liquidator disclaimed a lease, that did not determine any liability under the lease of the original lessee or of the guarantor in relation to leases or assignments of the leases executed after the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 had come into force on January 1, 1996, although the [...] [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:37 am
Regina v Iqbal Court of Appeal “For the time for proceedings for a confiscation order to be postponed, or extended beyond the permitted period of two years starting with the date of conviction, an application had to be made during the permitted period. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:24 am
ImmigrationProf has been covering Kerry v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:42 am
Regina v Richards Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “In respect of a charge of breach of a non-molestation order, the burden of proof was on the prosecution to show that the defendant, in acting as he did, acted without reasonable excuse. [read post]
21 Jan 2004, 4:01 pm
On January 22, 1973, the US Supreme Court handed down its split decision in Roe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 4:09 am
In SPIRA v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:40 am
Myerson v Myerson (No 2) Court of Appeal “A husband could not have an order compromising an ancillary relief application rewritten where his wealth had fallen significantly. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 1:17 am
Regina v Hughes (James) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “The statutory right of a single appeal to the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division was not removed when the Attorney-General referred the case to that court, since the defendant had not exercised his right to appeal. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 1:55 am
Regina v Winters Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “For the purpose of making the required assumptions in order to determine whether a defendant had benefited from drug trafficking, the Crown was required to prove on the balance of probabilities that the defendant had made payments out of payments received by him in connection with his drug trafficking. [...] [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:12 am
In the human rights litigation over Argentina's "dirty war" of the 1970s and 1980s, a dispute over personal jurisdiction has reached the Supreme Court and will be argued on October 15 (DaimlerChysler AG v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:35 am
Lee v Whitehouse Court of Appeal “A judge who was asked to make a possession order under section 98(1)(a) of the Rent Act 1977 on the ground that there was suitable alternative accommodation available had to decide whether or not it was reasonable to make an order by evaluating the effect on both parties if an order [...] [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:27 am
Regina v Burns Court of Appeal “Any right there might be to withdraw licence to a visitor to remain in one’s house and to use reasonable force to eject her therefrom could not be extended to one’s motor vehicle. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:12 am
Regina v Tilley Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “If a third party knew of a change that affected the benefit of a person claiming income support, he would be guilty of an offence only if he dishonestly allowed the beneficiary to fail to report the change provided that he had been active in some way in the [...] [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:37 am
Regina v Lucien Court of Appeal “Where a judge did not accept the basis of a defendant's plea of guilty, he was obliged to inform the defendant of that fact before proceeding to sentence. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 2:37 am
Jayasinghe v Liyanage Chancery Division “The function of the adjudicator to the Land Registry in relation to the entry of a restriction was not limited to determining whether the applicant had demonstrated an arguable claim within the meaning of section 42(1)(c) of the Land Registration Act 2002. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:36 am
Regina v Cockburn Court of Appeal, Criminal Division “An anti-intruder device driven by gravity and triggered by pressure on a wire was capable of amounting to an engine calculated to inflict grievous bodily harm, under the Offences against the Person Act 1861. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:51 am
Regina v Chargot and Others House of Lords “In criminal proceedings against an employer after an accident ot work, it was sufficient for the prosecution to prove merely a risk of injury arising from a state of affairs at work, without identifying and proving specific breaches of duty by the employer. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 1:47 am
Fisher v Brooker and Others House of Lords “A delay of almost 40 years in claiming a share of the copyright in a musical work, could not be defeated by the equitable doctrines of estoppel or laches when the defendants had suffered no detriment from the claimant's delay and, on the contrary, had derived a financial benefit [...] [read post]
