Search for: "Little v State"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 26,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:37 pm
Supreme Court concluded in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:09 am
ML Genius v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 9:17 am
In a transportation case involving a personal injury, Department of Transportation v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
There was, in my view, no allegation of scandal beyond the stated facts. [read post]
20 May 2008, 9:42 am
United States and Peretz v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 6:06 am
LoCascio v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:43 am
Recently, in McNeill v. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 4:48 am
Most books in this field have little or no material on the latter two topics. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Conover and McGaw v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:57 am
North Carolina State University] I noted last month that a Fourth Circuit panel had handed down a divided decision in Porter v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:05 am
” This description is a little cryptic, but I assume the defendants bought “long beach” for keyword ad triggers. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:55 pm
Sys. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:15 am
P.F.V. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 4:41 am
Ben Stevens and Rick Georges are not only lawyers using opposing systems; they are proponents who advise on the use of technology in the law office.They have strong opinions, and they're not afraid to state them. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:19 am
Idle-O Apartments v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:17 am
And this little stand was mighty successful. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:24 pm
I can grok that.But it nonetheless seems a little strange to say -- as Justice Nicholson does here -- that because FELA is a substantive statute with special rules, the applicable rule in state court is not a FELA-specific rule, but rather Rule 68. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 1:41 pm
Twitter brings news of this interesting little order in United States v. [read post]