Search for: "London v. State"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 4,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 11:29 pm
Austin v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2009] UKHL 5, [2009] 3 All ER 455 was a claim by a demonstrator who attended anti-capitalist protests in London. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
In the recent case of Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 4:16 am
https://www.financialinstitutionslegalsnapshot.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2024/09/Lowe-v-Certain-Underwriters-at-Lloyds-of-London-Subscribing-to-Policy-Number-ATCSI00100-2024-FCA-858.pdf Lowe v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London Subscribing to Policy Number ATCSI00100 [2024] FCA 858 – BarNet Jade – BarNet Jade [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 3:52 pm
This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court case, McAllen State Bank v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 3:52 pm
This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court case, McAllen State Bank v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
Some features that remain in the Rules are:Only "Universities and other non-profit educational bodies of higher or professional education established in a Member State of the European Union", and not commercial providers, will be able to offer the course (Rule 6).The minimum duration of the Course remains at 120 hours of lectures and practical training (Rule 4).Examination must include both a written and oral examination (Rule 4).Also unchanged is that a European patent… [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:14 pm
In July, the General Court ruled in Case T-768/20 (Standard International Management LLC v EUIPO) on the importance of distinguishing between the place where hotel and ancillary services are offered and the specific place of use of the mark when assessing genuine use of EU trade marks. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm
“, Turing Lecture Theatre, IET, London Savoy Place, Savoy Place, London WC2R 0BL 26 February 2018, “Global Internet and Jurisdiction Conference,” Ottawa, Canada. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:35 pm
For press release, see ECtHR Press Release R (SSHD) v HM Coroner for Inner West London [2010] EWHC 3098 (Admin) 30 Nov 2010. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Michael Knapp informed us that the Second Circuit has granted an en banc rehearing of United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare In preparation for Tuesday’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:24 am
Regarding the first factor, whether other judges had held alternative interpretations of the same language to be reasonable, the plaintiffs relied on two Kentucky cases, London v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 1:02 pm
Each contract was governed by English law and contained an arbitration clause requiring arbitration pursuant to the rules and procedures of the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA). [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:22 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:01 am
Plaintiffs in the federal Atlantic Yards eminent domain case were rejected in June 2008, though one justice, the conservative Samuel Alito stated that he would've granted the petition.As I wrote at the time, a decision to reject does not mean that the cases below were decided correctly, just that the appeal didn't present enough issues of law--conflicts in the interpretation of the Supreme Court's highly contested 6/23/05 Kelo v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 10:48 pm
New London, in which the Court upheld a city's use of eminent domain for economic development purposes under the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause. [read post]
