Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
Martin Kratz, R. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
Copyright is like theft and, on the authority of a dictum of Lord Browne-Wilkinson's in Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC [1996] AC 669, stolen property is subject to a constructive trust in favour of the rightful owner. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 1:52 am
This is consistent with the approach to art 39 adopted by Lord Browne Wilkinson and Lord Goff of Chieveley in the House of Lords in R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate; Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte [No 3] [2000] 1 AC 147; [1999] UKHL 17. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
Lips v Older was a case presented and argued as common law negligence only, apparently without the existence of the duty being disputed.In relation to Rimmer and Targett, the Claimant argued that issue was a positive duty of the landlord not to take steps to create a dangerous state of affairs and that this remained good law despite Murphy. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
Lips v Older was a case presented and argued as common law negligence only, apparently without the existence of the duty being disputed.In relation to Rimmer and Targett, the Claimant argued that issue was a positive duty of the landlord not to take steps to create a dangerous state of affairs and that this remained good law despite Murphy. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
This view of law as propounded by author Graham Virgo in his celebrated book The Principles of the Law of Restitution has been accepted by a later decision of the House of Lords (now the UK Supreme Court) in Sempra Metals Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
As all the fine Private International Law practitioners reading this post will know, forum non conveniens requires the Court’s consideration of the test set out by Lord Goff of Chieveley in Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
Lord Hardwicke’s Marriage Act of 1753 sought to change this and tighten the requirements. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:48 am
Goorbarry v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 6:33 am
In this regard, Biden v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:10 pm
The cases Department for Education v Information Commissioner & Whitmey The Upper Tribunal upheld a decision of the First Tier Tribunal (“FTT”), which required the Department of Education to disclose a 2014 letter (the “Letter”) from Lord Nash, Parliamentary Undersecretary of State for Schools (Conservative) to Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg relating to the public consultation for the proposed new Independent Schools Standards… [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:19 am
The Keynote speech [pdf] by Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, John Whittingdale MP. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:53 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:14 am
" People v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:09 am
Not only has she been overseeing the building of a new office in High Holborn (which will be fully open and operational from the beginning of January), she has also found time to write a post on the recent pre-nuptial case Z v Z, and another on Meeting “reasonable needs”: matrimonial v non-matrimonial assets. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
The Tribunal analysed the House of Lords judgment in great depth, and came to the conclusion that the judgment was inaccurate. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a… [read post]
