Search for: "MATTER OF C M R" Results 2001 - 2020 of 2,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
It didn’t matter what the current situation was or what it would be if the order was implemented, all that mattered was the decision as to whether the children might be reasonably expected to live with the father as well as the mother. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 8:59 am
  Here again, I’m not sure that this really fits the facts, as Wilson did not negligently cause death. [read post]
29 May 2008, 8:15 pm
Shea said the two sides are in mediation after Judge Peter C. [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
My concern is that some of the tickets for popular events run into thousands of pounds and so I’m concerned that the amount is too much. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:25 am
I’m not sure whether this focus on the legislative history is permissible, given United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:26 am by Dennis Crouch
Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 187-88 (1981) (“The ‘novelty’ of any element or steps in a process, or even of the process itself, is of no relevance in determining whether the subject matter of a claim falls within the § 101 categories of possibly patentable subject matter. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 10:03 pm
And first of all the [...] blogger, if in fact it's an individual person, and I'm assuming absent any evidence that it is another individual person, has a right not to be drawn into the litigation and forced to reveal identity or to impede on his or her First Amendment rights simply on a suspicion, however founded or unfounded, and I don't believe that this suspicion is sufficiently founded at this point to determine that it is Mr. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm by Maria Roche
At first instance, Mr Justice Collins dismissed TTM’s claim holding that his detention had not been unlawful until such time as the court declared the decision-making process to have been defective – applying R v Managers of South Western Hospital ex p M [1993] QB 683 and R v Central London County Court ex p London [1999] QB 1260 and distinguishing Re S-C (Mental Patient Habeas Corpus) [1996] QB 599 as it was not directly concerned with that… [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
., decided Friday by the Fifth Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Don R. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 5:35 pm by Mitchell Silverman
L.R. 7.1(a),(c)) mandate that memoranda of law in support and in opposition be filed for almost all motions. [read post]