Search for: "Matter of Kennedy"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 4,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
With the abolition of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” it is only a matter of time before, for the first time in American history, the lawful spouse of a soldier killed in battle is denied any survivor’s benefits. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:28 pm
Kennedy later asked whether the law would apply if Yates had taken pictures of the fish and destroyed both the pictures and the fish. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 1:53 pm
This may be the favorite parlor game of everyone who cares about the court, so I’m going to leave the details to you after making three observations, the first two relevant only if you think Justice Anthony Kennedy’s vote matters. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:54 am
Can the pro-defendant votes of Kennedy, Kagan, and Sotomayor in J.D.B. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:55 pm
” This theory apparently appealed to Kennedy as well. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm
Goldstein then jumped into the broader argument that the Court ought to abolish civil tort jurisdiction over non-Indians, as it did for criminal matters in Oliphant v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:24 pm
In 2011, Justice Kennedy is chewing out the Ninth Circuit for granting an ineffective assistance claim, but in 2012 Kennedy is overturning the Ninth Circuit’s denial of such a claim. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:37 am
To Kennedy, at least, it might matter. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:44 pm
The first is historian Paul Kennedy's take in TNR. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 8:05 pm
A trip down memory lanePrisoners lose landmark court vote caseThree prisoners today lost their landmark High Court battle to be allowed to vote.Their case, against the 1983 Representation of the People Act, was unanimously rejected by two senior judges in London.Lord Justice Kennedy and Mr Justice Garland said the men's case had been too simplistic and the issue of prisoners voting "is plainly a matter for Parliament and not for the courts".If successful, the case… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:53 pm
The concurrences, one by Justice Kennedy and joined by Justice Sotomayor, and one by Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Ginsberg, reached the same conclusion as the Scalia plurality on the Florida matter, but differed on the need to establish whether there was a need to decide if there is such a thing as a judicial taking. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:44 am
Sir Ian Kennedy, a former Dean at King’s College Law School, is no fool and he will have examined the matter most carefully. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 5:46 pm
The first is historian Paul Kennedy’s take in TNR. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 11:08 am
Justice Kennedy stated the disparagement provision “reflects the Government’s disapproval of a subset of messages it finds offensive. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm
Justice Kennedy provides no supporting evidence – and for good reason: there is none. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:56 pm
That gave Kennedy an opportunity to talk about one of his favorite subjects: how the citizenry can know whom to blame when something goes awry in government, when the lines get blur [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
On a more technical matter, the agencies are asking the court to dismiss the case for the suit's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 6:33 am
Connecticut – Ted Kennedy Jr. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Hawks in the Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon administrations saw the war as a battle to stop the expansion of Godless communism in the name o [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
As a practical matter, Justice Kennedy asked for more direction on what rule to apply regarding which parts of the law to separate: “So I need to know what standard you are asking me to apply. [read post]
