Search for: "Miller, in the Matter of"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 5,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2012, 7:29 am
” Miller-Jenkins v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:22 pm
(The defense has already brought in a physician to testify on the matter, and Miller feels that testimony from the commander of Joint Task Force Guantanamo is unn [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 3:28 am
Miller agreed that Ms. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:56 am
” All of this matters, of course. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
This matters– and matters a lot– because in the interim cases, before another GPS case comes to the Supreme Court, judges are going to pay attention to Jones for any hints of a future outcome. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:16 am
Miller’s answer was, essentially, “no. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:56 am
” All of this matters, of course. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
In the Matter of Keith T. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:28 am
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:43 pm
Apparently, that's all changed.In April this year (if I'm reading the on-line docket correctly), Miller filed a motion asking for an ex parte hearing to address "defense investigation into mitigation matters. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:20 am
Embassy on appropriate matters to ensure that the victims first receive quality care for their injuries and then get out of China in a medically feasible manner,” the statement said. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:56 am
” All of this matters, of course. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 8:04 am
UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER, AND JONES. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 2:28 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
Miller, No. 11-20676 (5th Cir. [read post]
27 May 2024, 11:54 am
Plaintiff Miller believes in the sanctity of life from conception until natural death. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
{We apply [the Miller standard for "obscenity"] as the Commonwealth pursued a theory equating "obscene language" with the Miller standard, and the jury was instructed accordingly.} [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:26 pm
Does this dispute matter? [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 6:45 am
Miller, 425 U.S. 435, 442-44 (1976) (no legitimate expectation of privacy in bank records); Couch v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:29 pm
LBE raised this issue, in print, before the Bell matter was posted or published.#2 is more interesting. [read post]
