Search for: "NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES" Results 2001 - 2020 of 3,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2011, 6:17 pm by Brian Shaw
  The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania agreed finding in favor of Lesher. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:17 am by Andrew Frisch
Travelers removed the matter to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and filed a Motion for Summary Judgment seeking the dismissal of the complaint and an order compelling Vilches to arbitrate their individual wage and hour claims. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am by Peter Mahler
In an update to the latter post I also mention a 2012 New Jersey decision rejecting jurisdiction to hear a dissolution petition for New York LLCs. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Marina District Development Company, a New Jersey appellate court joins a long line of courts that simply refuse to see the illegal and harmful stereotyping embodied in sex-specific dress codes. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:36 am by Ben
 He is being held in a high security prison in Västervik, although he recently requested a transfer to a lower safety class unit. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association and New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:42 pm by Georgetown Law Journal
Dean Kevin Johnson, University of California Davis School of Law, How Racial Profiling in America Became the Law of the Land: United States v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am by Anthony Gaughan
For example, although New Jersey’s new sports betting law (which was the test case that gave rise to the Murphy v NCAA ruling) prohibits wagering on New Jersey-related college games, it permits gambling on out-of-state games involving out-of-state college teams. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:37 am by John Jascob
Jason Howard, J.D.The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has determined that a former UBS employee's testimony before FINRA did not equate to providing information to the SEC as required by the Dodd-Frank Act’s definition of “whistleblower” (Price v. [read post]