Search for: "NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 3,520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am
In an update to the latter post I also mention a 2012 New Jersey decision rejecting jurisdiction to hear a dissolution petition for New York LLCs. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:56 am
Chief Executive Officer Paul V. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
Giovanetti, a resident of New Jersey, spent twenty-seven of his workin [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
New Jersey. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am
ParkCase number: 12-cv-7601 (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey)Case filed: December 14, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: December 17, 2012 1/4/2013 4/4/2013 2013-7 SEC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am
This is the so-called “eight-state solution” suggested by the United States today, which would directly affect only those states (California, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, and Rhode Island) that already treat same-sex couples the same as opposite-sex couples in virtually all ways but one. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:43 am
Moreover, the Court found that the Husband had substantial resources and frequently traveled to the United States, therefore did not show that it would be a hardship for him to travel to New Jersey to litigate this matter. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:33 am
District Court for the District of New Jersey 2003). [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:07 am
Four states actually rejected the amendment outright; in addition to Mississippi, Delaware, Kentucky, and New Jersey also said no (symbolically). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Perry, the plaintiffs challenge California’s voter-adopted ban on same-sex marriage (Proposition 8), and in the other, United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm
Perry, and twenty-six topside amicus briefs (not including that of the Court-appointed amica) have been filed in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:15 am
“[V]isitors to [defendant’s] Internet homepage were able to click a link [to purchase defendant’s product] . . . and then select ‘United States’ and ‘Delaware’ from separate drop-down menus. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 8:15 am
It must uphold the principles of the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:41 am
New Jersey, 306 U.S. 451, 59 S. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 12:35 pm
J7J has sold 33,000 hips in the United States prior to the recall. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000); Texas v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:35 am
New York v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:07 pm
Justice Breyer was troubled by the Nicastro facts - one product, simply one machine, being the basis of jurisdiction in New Jersey. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Other LawsuitsSimilar lawsuits have been filed in the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia County and in New Jersey Superior Court, Burlington County.The Pennsylvania complaint alleges a state-wide class action brought under the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL) “over identical, false, affirmative misstatements of material fact and knowing material omissions made by Subway regarding its trademarked ‘Footlong’… [read post]