Search for: "OR Specific, Inc."
Results 2001 - 2020
of 37,638
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2023, 9:00 am
Hatzel & Buehler, Inc., Civil Action No. 3:23-cv-03093-MAS-JBD) in U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:40 am
Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Last Thursday’s split summary-judgment decision in the case that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought against Ripple Labs, Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Ass’n, Inc., 120 F.2d 738 (2d Cir. 1941). [5] 4(a)(2) transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 5:16 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:07 pm
There are folks from all over the country on the list, but only one New Jersey outfit: Edwards Vacuum Inc. of Parsippany, shown as owing $558,000 in Tri-Met payroll tax. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:18 pm
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure specifically provide that "[t]he title of the complaint must name all the parties. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:09 pm
Recorded Future, Inc., a former employee residing in Virginia brought claims against his former employer under Massachusetts’ anti-discrimination laws as well as the Massachusetts Wage Act (“Wage Act”). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Abitron garnered far less attention than did other intellectual property (IP) cases argued this term, including Jack Daniels Products, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:27 am
Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuit against Ripple Labs Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
InCoinbase, Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm
” In Tico, Inc. v Borrok (57 AD3d 302 [1st Dept 2008]), the Court wrote, “Although the court properly determined that plaintiffs lacked standing on the basis that they did not make a formal demand on all of the general partners and failed to demonstrate that such a demand would have been futile, dismissal of the complaint with prejudice was improper. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 5:56 pm
Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 4:51 pm
” Similarly, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, in Lucky Cousins Trucking, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
Authors: Steve Cernak and Luis Blanquez This week a federal judge in California denied a preliminary injunction to block Microsoft’s $68.7 billion merger with Activision Blizzard Inc. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Covalent, Inc., No. 2022-1308, — F.4th — (Fed. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:16 am
On July 13, 2023, the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York issued the hotly anticipated ruling in the SEC’s case against Ripple Labs, Inc. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Moreover, there are no allegations related to breaching a promise to acehive a specific result, but only allegations about breaches of vague and non-specific (and somewhat boilerplate) provisions of the retainer agreement (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656 [1st Dept 2016] citing Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 251 AD2d 3 5, 3 9 [1st Dept 1998] [ dismissing breach of contract claim as duplicative of legal malpractice claim where there were no allegations about a… [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 4:05 am
Roncalli High School, Inc., (7th Cir., July 13, 2023), the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the ministerial exception doctrine requires dismissal of a suit which was brought by a Catholic high school guidance counselor whose contract was not renewed because her same-sex marriage was inconsistent with the Catholic school's religious mission. [read post]
