Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
Mohr v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:46 am
The Government has not made any formal comment recently on the use of SLAPPs. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:53 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:28 am
The Court actually can sidestep a number of more difficult questions in patent law (about the precise meaning of the standard under Diamond v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:10 pm
” Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
Instead we got an opinion that considered which precise interests are protected by Exemption 4. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:31 pm
In determining the requisite capacity to execute a will, the bright line is the precise time of execution. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:46 am
This new standard runs counter to the Court’s well-established case-la [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
Discovery is used to find the details. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 8:35 pm
If so, what were the precise undertakings of confidentiality given by the individual who created the record, to whom were they given, when, why and in what form? [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:27 am
Cubatabaco v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:10 pm
In Roberts v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:02 am
The court declines to lower the pleading standards for this case.Id. at at 6 (citation and footnote omitted).A few hours later, we received another missive (and not for the first time) from Mike Imbroscio at Covington enclosing Davis v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:29 am
Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:52 pm
" This is far from a precise standard, and it often will not be easy to tell where mere ordinary disproportion ends, and the "gross" kind begins. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:15 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
It is the standard that the vast majority of 15 other countries have. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:51 pm
Statistical confidence intervals / sampling – the use of statistics as a way to bolster process defensibility is starting to come to maturity and in the future I think that detailed precision, recall and other statistical indicates will play a large role in e-discovery defensibility. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:45 am
It was introduced in Nixon v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 8:20 am
Conversely, if the rules were not followed precisely, a good attorney would use each rule violation as evidence of negligent behavior. [read post]
