Search for: "People v Levelle" Results 2001 - 2020 of 12,299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2023, 10:13 am by Matthew Segal
While this deeper investment in state-level legal advocacy may be new, the ACLU is no stranger to taking to the states to protect and extend our rights. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Because if we think about 10 years ago v. today there’s been extraordinary progress. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:30 am
He was one of the lead lawyers in the landmark Supreme Court ruling in Romer v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:13 am by Frank Cranmer
It is clearly thought out and based on an assessment of reading the claimant refers to”; the tribunal accepted that the stated belief was about a “weighty and substantial aspect of human life and behaviour”; and on balance, the belief had a level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance, even though there were likely to be a great many people who disagreed with it [43]. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:37 am by Christine Hurt
  I went to law school at a time in which my degree was heavily subsidized by the people of the great state of Texas. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:54 pm
Okay, so I'll take that last comment -- intended or not -- as a (perhaps entirely deserved) slam on people who include myself. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 3:29 am by Earl Drott
People pursuing claims against employers for harm caused by an employee’s car accident must demonstrate that the employer’s negligence directly led to the crash in question, however, otherwise their claims may be dismissed, as demonstrated recently in Jesus Yanez v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
But the level of support the petition has just received at this decisive stage exceeds my expectations.One major caveat is that Apple might still be able to orchestrate something big as well. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 2:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s one thing that puzzles me about United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 6:10 am
The Court found that without question, the defendant's conduct rose to the level of depravity "manifested by brutal, heinous and despicable acts" (citing People v Suarez, 6 NY3d 202,  at 214) necessary to establish culpability for second-degree murder. [read post]