Search for: "People v Word" Results 2001 - 2020 of 17,906
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
This difference is relevant both insofar as the unique restrictions upon article 301 in the Indian context ought to lead to different results and in that the words of section 92 and Part XIII are (as the High Court emphasised in Cole v Whitfield) the results of particular historical and political contexts. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:16 am
Scott testified that his emails discussed many people within NAPPS or connected to NAPPS and were not directed at Mr. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
But that understand was contrary to the statutory wording, which allowed for the prosecution of any crimes. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:09 pm
I’m at a loss for words. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am by John Elwood
Because it’s often said that the Germans have a word for everything, it’s worth checking in with the people who gave us schadenfreude and weltschmerz to see what they have to describe the current crisis. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In other words, under more recent Supreme Court precedent, Garcia may no longer be good law.The intervening Supreme Court precedent on sovereign immunity and the ADA is United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 2:45 pm by Karen Gullo
” For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/petition-writ-lenz-v-universal For more on Lenz v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:36 am by Orin Kerr
(Orleans Parish Sheriff’s Office) A lot of people have been having good fun with a short opinion by Justice Scott J. [read post]