Search for: "People v. Harding" Results 2001 - 2020 of 8,865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Eric Goldman
I previously described the case facts: “A lawyer was unhappy with a Yelp review about her. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  The claim follows the Federal Government’s loss of a hard drive concerning personal information about 583,000 people. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Nowhere would tribal peoples have agreed to our own destruction, it is and has been a forced hand. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:01 am by Ronald Mann
… [Y]ou have repose under his theory, in the sense that you know what people are suing you about. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 8:51 am by Eric
And patent cases don't have a monopoly on hard technological questions; think about the technological sophistication to resolve Oracle v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:01 pm by Ilya Somin
It's hard to think of a reason why Bowers was more wrong or more harmful in 2003 than it was in 1986. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 1:34 pm
But beer is also a tipple close to my heart, and so I was pleased to learn that a brew I like will be available for sale in Ontario’s Liquor Control Board stores, and not just on draught at pubs that are hard to find. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Charlotte Law Library
And the world is full of people running about with lit matches. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:08 pm
But some people who have the option of a life in legal academia choose otherwise. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 11:13 am by Jon Ibanez
However, the California Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]