Search for: "People v. House" Results 2001 - 2020 of 11,351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2007, 6:42 am
People v Scott, 79 N.Y.2d 474, 498-499, 593 N.E.2d 1328, 583 N.Y.S.2d 920; People v Burger, 67 N.Y.2d 338, 344, 493 N.E.2d 926, 502 N.Y.S.2d 702). [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 6:39 am
People v Scott, 79 N.Y.2d 474, 498-499, 593 N.E.2d 1328, 583 N.Y.S.2d 920; People v Burger, 67 N.Y.2d 338, 344, 493 N.E.2d 926, 502 N.Y.S.2d 702). [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 7:27 am
As people living in California, and especially the bay area, know, housing prices are well above the national average. [read post]
Our victory benefited thousands of immigrant detainees across the Ninth Circuit, which houses 25 percent of people currently in immigration lock-up. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 11:36 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
  In response, the Project stated that such rights may be more limited than the legal rights people have, and may not necessarily include the right to file lawsuits. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Capital Press, Oregon] House committee flays department over use of “hot goods” orders to arm-twist growers of perishables on labor issues [committee, CQ via Dunn Carney, The Grower] Sauce for gander: if left can push labor ordinances at county and municipal level, supporters of right-to-work laws might do the same thing [James Sherk and Andrew Kloster, Heritage] “I wonder how large the overlap is between people who want Ray Rice banished from NFL… [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:02 pm by ACLU
s=20In Illinois, a federal court ordered the Department of Corrections to take immediate steps to improve housing and health care conditions for transgender people. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 5:42 am by Scott Bomboy
Because the Constitution’s Article V does not require the president to approve a constitutional amendment, there are fewer steps for a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment in the House or Senate. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
Second,in Harrison v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 1736, the Court of Appeal held that the right only extended to those person who cared for children who would otherwise be compelled to leave the country.Finally, in R (Sanneh) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 793 (Admin), the Administrative Court held that the provision of subsistence payments and accommodation under s.17, Children Act 1989 were sufficient to ensure that an individual would not be compelled to leave the UK.In R (HC) v SSWP… [read post]
6 May 2008, 9:44 am
Mildred Loving, a plaintiff in the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case shows us what it's all about.The case is United States v. [read post]