Search for: "People v. Profit" Results 2001 - 2020 of 4,430
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:52 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This term we will also eagerly be awaiting the judgment in cases such as R v Jogee; Ruddock v The Queen (Jamaica) which was heard on 27-28 October 2015. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:10 am by Florian Mueller
Tesla is showing the way, but Apple may be able to do this in a far more profitable way. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:55 am by Eric Goldman
Rev. 1929 (2015) * Cracked: 6 Times People Have Legally Claimed To Own Everyday Things [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Since LISPCC is not a police agency, it cannot represent to the public that it is a police or state agency (Abrams v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 2:33 pm by CPLEAadmin
Not-For-Profit LawPeter BroderThe “No Gifts to Unqualified Donees” Rule Law and LiteratureRob NormeyThe Peterloo Massacre and The Mask of Anarchy Famous CasesPeter Bowal, Enza Rosi, and Christopher TangLac Minerals v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  The approach should work, particularly if doctors are generally selfish, profit-driven, and looking for opportunities to shirk. [read post]
  As we store away the wrapping paper and pull out the New Years’ hat and horns, we thought it would be a good time to review the significant agricultural law developments of 2015. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 10:15 am
    Winning the Freedom to Marry Our Supreme Court victory in Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 3:39 am
Dahl himself is reported to have said:"People are so damn bored, tired of all their problems. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:09 pm by Dean Freeman
Putting profits over people in these situations is a clear example of nursing home negligence. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Seventy-six people were aboard. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:17 am by John Hopkins
Let’s face it by the time the constitutionality of the caps on damages was decided, the insurance industry would have successfully denied plenty of injured people full compensation, which translates to more profit for the insurance industry. [read post]