Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 4,664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
We had spent much of the term, both in and out of class, discussing the legal questions involved in the case that came to be known as Bush v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
I've started to get questions from people about the California initiative, certified as qualified for the ballot yesterday. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:38 am
Jefferson that a lawyer had rendered ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to suppress a GPS search. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:15 am
Lack of standing does not render a judgment void for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
In Benecard Servs. v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 11:05 am
” People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:01 am
The background to Snyder v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Sebelius and Florida v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Sebelius and Florida v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
In Gray v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
Abbott has two CGM devices on the market - the Freestyle Libre 1 and Libre 2 - which Abbott claims is the top selling CGM product in the world, used by 3 million people in 50 countries. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 12:05 pm
See, e.g., Livingston v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:29 am
Arenas v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Where a class of potential claimants is excluded from those rights, the court is entitled to inquire into the reasons for the exclusion, and ask whether it serves any legitimate purpose, or leads to results “so anomalous as to render the legislation unacceptable” (J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v UK (2008) 46 EHRR 45, para 83).There was no clear basis for the 3 year limit in the contemporary material. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Where a class of potential claimants is excluded from those rights, the court is entitled to inquire into the reasons for the exclusion, and ask whether it serves any legitimate purpose, or leads to results “so anomalous as to render the legislation unacceptable” (J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v UK (2008) 46 EHRR 45, para 83).There was no clear basis for the 3 year limit in the contemporary material. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 1:18 pm
ShareOn Tuesday, in Cruz v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
In 1976, in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:25 am
The recent criminal case of R. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:38 am
In People v. [read post]
