Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 2001 - 2020 of 3,635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 1:06 pm by Paralegal Student
In a decision dated February 12th 2014, the Supreme Court of Ontario upheld this verdict citing a 2009 case Royal Bank v McPherson. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:31 am
The Appeals Court sent the case back to Hampden Superior Court for the hearing. [read post]
27 May 2008, 2:26 pm
Justice Joseph Quinn, of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice at St. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Marvin Schuldiner
So if tax filings were not done correctly, a Superior Court Judge is obligated (under the Sheridan v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
At least 147 people were sickened and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
" At a court hearing held before Kearney was ever notified, RI Superior Court Judge Susan McGuirl issued a temporary restraining order requiring the removal of any and all references to Narcisi from Kearney's website and all other "associated" sites. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
The Supreme Court on March 2, 2010, addressed the extent to which courts may consider copyright infringement lawsuits filed by people who have not registered their intellectual property with the federal government. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
"People in an open society do not demand infallibility from their institutions, but it is difficult for them to accept what they are prohibited from observing. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am by cassieq
He remained in the position until being elected a Pima County Superior Court Judge. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, the lower court's decision creates incentives for people to commit crimes; and it undermines the legal and constitutional rights of law-abiding businesses and their clients. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Is it likely the Supreme Court - or the Superior Court in San Francisco, to which this case should be returning for entry of a final order - would grant a stay? [read post]