Search for: "Powers v. Thomas" Results 2001 - 2020 of 5,408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm by Dianne Saxe
Unsurprisingly, the four opposed are Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and Alito. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:02 am by Orin Kerr
At the same time that the individual mandate was being enacted in Congress, the Supreme Court heard a very signifiicant case on the Necessary and Proper Clause, United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
  But when Bexis took his act to Wisconsin, he got his head handed to him in Thomas v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:32 pm by David Kravets
If confirmed by the Senate, Verilli, now the White House deputy counsel, would assume the powerful position left vacant by Elena Kagan, who was elevated to the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT October 24, 2007 THOMAS K. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:20 am by Ilya Somin
Admittedly, the Supreme Court ruled that such sweeping congressional power was permissible in its badly flawed decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 7:08 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Summary In MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 553 and Globe Motors Inc v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 6:23 am by Matt Cooper
Justices Thomas and Alito wrote dissents, beginning at p. 25 of the Court’s order list. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:32 am by Ilya Somin
NCAA, holding that the federal government had no power to force states to ban activities under state law, and Thomas voted with the majority. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:03 pm by Jo-Ann Wallace
  It can also result from clear power relationships, such as exist with landlords, creditors and the like. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:23 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This holding was 6-3, as Justice Gorsuch dissented, joined by Justices Thomas and Alito. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost pushes back against Justices Neil Gorsuch’s and Clarence Thomas’ recent assertions that “so-called universal injunctions [are] a recent development, contrary to historical practice and constitutional limits on judicial power. [read post]