Search for: "Price v. United States"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 5,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2021, 8:31 am
In this respect, European merger control law reflected U.S. antitrust law at or around the time of United States v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 11:35 am
Here is the opinion: United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:55 pm
(So, as in the United States, governments in Europe might violate the competition laws). [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:03 am
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole A. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:20 am
Previously, in Omega v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
Cir. 2005) (holding that users of accused system could not infringe method claims in the United States because one step of the method was performed in Canada). [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:04 am
The conference had a record number of attendees--180 practitioners from all over the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 12:47 pm
Shares of the resources described in paragraphs A and B, shall increase on an annual basis by three unit percent d. [read post]
Can Deals That Do Not Trigger an HSR Filing Raise Antitrust Concerns? Yes, Buyer and Sellers Beware!
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
The antitrust agencies have challenged consummated deals valued as low as $3 million (see George’s/Tysons, Complaint, United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:24 am
In Securities & Exchange Commission v. [read post]
ABA Section of Antitrust Law Spring Meeting 2016: Clarifying liability in hub-and-spoke conspiracies
4 May 2016, 10:08 am
United States. [read post]
27 Nov 2024, 10:38 am
In closing, let me note, as the book's conclusion also does, that we should not exaggerate the United States's challenges. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:53 pm
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of WisconsinOpinion Date: 9/7/11Cite: Thiesing v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
This issue came up a few years ago in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:08 am
§ 78u-4 (“Reform Act”), should be applied less rigorously in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:53 am
A third possibility is that the decision of the United States to support Marietta will motivate the justices to accept its pricing. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
That change is visible within the apex organs of the contemporary state system ((Text of A/ES-11/L.1; UN General Assembly Resolution -- "Aggression against Ukraine"; UKRAINE v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:24 am
United Staffing Alliance Employee Medical Plan (CVSG 9/1/2007) (standard for judging denials of medical benefits by plan administrators) No. 07-81, Exxon Mobil v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
Those were the questions reviewed by the New York State Court of Appeals in 328 Owners Corp. v. 330 W. 86 Oaks Corp. [read post]
