Search for: "S. W. v. State"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 14,897
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2021, 9:46 am
This case arises out of a lawsuit between Jackson Women’s Health Organization—the only abortion provider in the state—and the state of Mississippi. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 11:54 am
Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and… [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:57 am
The specific question before the Court is “[w]hether the U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
I blogged about the 1938 Wyoming State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 8:10 am
“[W]e hold that the waters of the Middle Claiborne Aquifer are subject to the judicial remedy of equitable apportionment,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the unanimous opinion in Mississippi v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
[v] MINISTÉRIO DE MINAS E ENERGIA. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 12:00 am
On Thursday 25th November, the Court will hear the case of Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another, at 10:30 in Courtroom One. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm
”[30]OSHA’s Cost-Benefit and Feasibility Analysis Is Incomplete and UnderinclusiveA further problem with the November ETS is that OSHA did not adequately compare the costs and benefits of the proposed ETS and conducted an underinclusive economic feasibility analysis.[31] Reviewing courts have stated that, “even if adequately explained, an ETS must, on balance, produce a benefit the costs of which are not unreasonable. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:21 am
’” Meehan v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 1:13 am
IndiaX v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
State Bar of Cal., No. 3:20-cv-06442-LB (N.D. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am
The PRA states that “[t]he United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 7:52 am
”] From Callahan v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:05 pm
In a 1990 case known as Women’s Equity Action League v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:25 am
Aside from assuaging the AMA’s social justice warriors, the substitutions are not remotely synonymous. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 12:51 am
[v] Hence, the finality of arbitration award is overall enshrined in England. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 6:50 am
In Mentone Solutions LLC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 8:40 am
However, not all states follow the RIMA’s standard. [read post]
