Search for: "STRANGE v. STATE" Results 2001 - 2020 of 2,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2009, 12:57 am
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:50 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, American Risk Insurance Company, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm by Jim Walker
  He wrote the amicus curiae briefs for  the cruise industry in the case of Carnival v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am by Tobias Lutzi
This is particularly interesting because these Regulations have not been updated since Brexit, which means they still refer, for instance, to “the law of the other member State”. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:06 am
Speaking at Iona College in New York Tuesday, Justice Antonin Scalia said critics of the Bush v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:00 am by Justin P. Webb
Additionally, its hard to see where a case like this fits within juvenile 8th Amendment cases such as Roper v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Supreme Court began building out sexual harassment law from a Title VII case in 1986, Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Some Food for Thought After Lee v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 9:30 pm
  And - this is the point this post is working its way toward - it's not a tool that's unique to the powerful political movement kick-started by the Supreme Court's Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
And to add a little humor factor, Lowering the Bar discusses Knights Templar v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 11:52 am
Tushnet and Yackle, in a study of statutory reform in the United States (available here) look at three kinds of statutes - expressive, instrumental and symbolic. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:20 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" asks @dorfonlaw pjblack.me/zjl1Ap #lwb242 the fascinating story behind the case: "Lawrence v Texas: How Laws Against Sodomy Became Unconstitutional" pjblack.me/yW6J9C yay! [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 11:41 am
  Would we be in this national lose-lose situation without the Court's two Bush v. [read post]