Search for: "Samples v. Samples" Results 2001 - 2020 of 5,707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2010, 11:53 am by Dwight Sullivan
  First came last term’s CAAF decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:09 pm
(Editor's Note: This post comes to us from Christian Leuz of the University of Chicago, NBER and ECGI, Karl V. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:42 pm by Chuck Ramsay
Yesterday, the Minnesota Court of Appeals issued an incredibly troubling decision in the case of State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
In fact, evidence-based treatment and social policy is the most ethical approach and should be a goal for all practitioners and lawmakers (Douglas, Cox, & Webster, 1999; Grove & Meehl, 1996).Because public perception can influence policy development (Sample & Kadleck, 2006; Zgoba, 2004), it is important to gain an understanding of the degree to which community members demonstrate valid knowledge about sex offenders. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:04 am
Woodall objected to the denial of his right to cross-examine, and informed the court that he intended to question the Technical Supervisor on the Intoxilyzer's ability to correlate the temperature of the breath sample. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]