Search for: "Second Watch" Results 2001 - 2020 of 21,536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2007, 1:04 am
In this recent episode of "Fresh Air," Herzog explains why he made a second movie about Dengler. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 5:27 am
"Case Touches a 2nd Amendment Nerve": Today in The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse has an article that begins, "Both sides in a closely watched legal battle over the District of Columbia's strict gun-control law are urging the Supreme Court to hear the case. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 11:06 am by Stephen Bilkis
” A New York Criminal Lawyer said the offenders were charged with Petit Larceny, five counts of Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument in the Third Degree, and Obstructing Governmental Administration in the Second Degree, all Class A misdemeanors. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 50 comment b (1965). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:35 am by Matthew Weiss
 Citing a study showing that almost 20% of all car accidents involve distracted driving, I concluded that watching a tiny screen in your eyewear while driving a car would is extremely dangerous. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:35 am by Matthew Weiss
 Citing a study showing that almost 20% of all car accidents involve distracted driving, I concluded that watching a tiny screen in your eyewear while driving a car would is extremely dangerous. [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:31 pm
 So I see where the majority's coming from.By contrast, the second part of the opinion, I simply don't get.Here's the issue, and some of the underlying facts. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:39 pm by Kevin
We even watched "Patch Adams," because you said that's what you wanted to watch, not because I like that movie. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:42 am by Heidi A. Nadel
., that a party seeking dismissal based on the anti-SLAPP statute must show that a claim is "based solely" on petitioning activity even to move on to the second prong of the anti-SLAPP analysis. [read post]
3 May 2016, 4:59 pm by kgates
” A copy of the Second Circuit’s opinion is available here. [1] http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/2008/03/now-watch-the-lawyers-blitz-the-nfl-destroyed-the-tapes-but-it-still-hasnt-escaped-the-sack/ [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 11:26 am by Irene
Hanson’s appointment by TSA Director David Pekoske to be second in command at FAMS immediately raised questions about the criteria to qualify for the top-secret clearance required for the position and ignited fury among air marshals nationwide. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:19 am by Todd Rodriguez
The emergence of narrow network HMO products is a trend worth watching for several reasons: first, it demonstrates that third party payers are aggressively seeking to better manage health care costs and are looking for innovative ways to do so; and, second, it is apparent that as new products are developed, those providers who are integrated (both horizontally and vertically) are most likely to be the players of choice, as they will presumably have a greater ability to… [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:44 am by Stephen Bilkis
A Suffolk County Criminal attorney said that in May 2007, the defendant and four other individuals were arrested and charged with, inter alia, murder in the second degree, burglary in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, for their alleged involvement in stealing a wrist watch and marijuana from the home of the victim, who was shot and killed during the course of the burglary in May 2007. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  You can watch the report here. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:20 pm by Valerie Katz
There are two important factors to consider, however, when determining whether or not to advertise on television.(1) Budget:According to Fairley, television ads are known as “interruption-based marketing,” meaning that they depend on interrupting the consumer who is trying to watch their favorite television show and get their attention for 30 seconds. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:20 am by Matthew David Brozik
So if it appears that you’re not watching broadcast television—even if you are—then advertisers aren’t going to pay to advertise during shows you aren’t watching, even if you are. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 4:37 pm by Matthew David Brozik
So if it appears that you’re not watching broadcast television — even if you are — then advertisers aren’t going to pay to advertise during shows you aren’t watching, even if you are. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
and video of SocialText 3.0 in 60 seconds: [read post]