Search for: "Smith, Appeal of" Results 2001 - 2020 of 10,310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2013, 9:55 am by Sheppard Mullin
By Kevin Smith and Brian Murphy  On July 9, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Torres et al. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 1:30 am by Orin S. Kerr
Not even the government, in its opposition brief on appeal, thought Karo was relevant enough to the geofence warrant issue to cite it even once. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
That is a much better case to present on appeal because it means you can’t do what HHJ Walden-Smith did in this case and just play the freehold ownership as a trump card.Ultimately, of course, HHJ Walden-Smith is probably right in her decision. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
That is a much better case to present on appeal because it means you can’t do what HHJ Walden-Smith did in this case and just play the freehold ownership as a trump card.Ultimately, of course, HHJ Walden-Smith is probably right in her decision. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm by Steven Calabresi
  Here is a link to the filed Amicus Brief: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-624/293864/20231220140217967_US%20v.%20Trump%20amicus%20final.pdf My concern about the legality of Jack Smith's appointment is both a concern that Trump's convictions might eventually be overturned by the Supreme Court on appeal, because Jack Smith was unconstitutionally appointed, and a concern that even someone who has conducted himself, in the way that Donald Trump… [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:16 pm
He has since exhausted all of his state appellate remedies and is now pursuing appeals through the federal system. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 6:15 am by Brian Shiffrin
According to defendant, his appeal from the judgment of conviction was pending when the treatment was offered and, in the event of reversal on appeal and a subsequent new trial on all counts of the indictment, his participation in treatment would have required him to make admissions against his interest, in violation of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Over-vigorous application of a statutory offence might be greeted in similar terms to those employed by the Lord Chief Justice in the Twitter Joke Trial case (Chambers v DPP), an appeal from conviction under s.127 of the Communications Act 2003: “The 2003 Act did not create some newly minted interference with the first of President Roosevelt’s essential freedoms – freedom of speech and expression. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 10:27 am by Madelaine Lane
Smith which was decided this past December. [read post]
19 May 2019, 1:05 pm
Cir. 2016); see In re Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, and Smith, Inc., 828 F.2d 1567, 1571 (Fed. [read post]