Search for: "Square, Inc." Results 2001 - 2020 of 3,517
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2014, 8:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Household Int'l, Inc.: "The realistic alternative to a class action is not 17 million individual suits, but zero individual suits, as only a lunatic or a fanatic sues for $30." [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Thus, as briefed and argued, Italian Colors provided about as square a test of the "effective vindication" theory as can be imagined. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
I have posted the opinion here: In the Matter of the Search of Information Associated with [redacted]@mac.com that is Stored at Premises Controlled by Apple, Inc. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:03 pm by Dan Flynn
No Listeria illnesses associated with Parkers Farm Inc. food products recalled over the weekend have yet been reported to the Minnesota Department of Health, says spokesman Doug Schultz. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
Supreme Court has never squarely ruled on the question.) [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:30 pm by Lyle Denniston
One company is Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., and a related company, Mardel, Inc. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:35 pm
  That's impossible to square with a tort duty to do so immediately.]Even the FDA recognizes the longstanding right of physicians to prescribe drugs beyond the uses and populations included in their label. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
In this instance, the court squarely rejected the plaintiff’s assertion that Benton stood for the general proposition that a lack of a uniform policy is a certifiable issue. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:42 pm by Robert Kreisman
Merchandise Mart Properties, Inc. $222,000 Jury Verdict For Car Repair Customer’s Toe Injured by Hydraulic Lift Assisted-Living Facility Worker Falls on Unsafe Ramp; Jury Verdict $1.83 Million [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Although he argued his communication fell squarely within an exemption to the statutory definition of a consumer report, the court disagreed. [read post]