Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 2001 - 2020 of 3,526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2013, 7:59 pm by Seth R. Parker
According to the statistics tabulated by the Office of Children’s Issues, there were 799 new cases reported to the State Department of child abduction in the United States in 2012. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:27 am by Susan Brenner
Defendant’s Response to United States’ Opposition to Motion to Suppress Evidence, U.S. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by Allison Trzop
  Anticipating what a victory for same-sex advocates could mean in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am by Peter Mahler
In an update to the latter post I also mention a 2012 New Jersey decision rejecting jurisdiction to hear a dissolution petition for New York LLCs. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
Giovanetti, a resident of New Jersey, spent twenty-seven of his workin [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
ParkCase number: 12-cv-7601 (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey)Case filed: December 14, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: December 17, 2012 1/4/2013 4/4/2013 2013-7 SEC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am by Marty Lederman
  This is the so-called “eight-state solution” suggested by the United States today, which would directly affect only those states (California, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, and Rhode Island) that already treat same-sex couples the same as opposite-sex couples in virtually all ways but one. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:43 am by Lauren E. Koster
 Moreover, the Court found that the Husband had substantial resources and frequently traveled to the United States, therefore did not show that it would be a hardship for him to travel to New Jersey to litigate this matter. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:33 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the District of New Jersey 2003). [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:07 am by Kevin
Four states actually rejected the amendment outright; in addition to Mississippi, Delaware, Kentucky, and New Jersey also said no (symbolically). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perry, the plaintiffs challenge California’s voter-adopted ban on same-sex marriage (Proposition 8), and in the other, United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm by Marty Lederman
Perry, and twenty-six topside amicus briefs (not including that of the Court-appointed amica) have been filed in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:15 am by Samantha G. Wilson
“[V]isitors to [defendant’s] Internet homepage were able to click a link [to purchase defendant’s product] . . . and then select ‘United States’ and ‘Delaware’ from separate drop-down menus. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 8:15 am by Adrienne Kendrick
It must uphold the principles of the Constitution of the United States. [read post]