Search for: "State v. Back"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 42,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2014, 6:28 am
The recent Florida Supreme Court decision, Estate of McCall v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:28 am
In US v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 6:30 am
Back in 1981, the High Court in Gazzo v Comptroller of Stamps (Vic) held that s.90 was not valid so far as it applied to transfers of land in Victoria, in attempting to prevent Victorian stamp duty being charged. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
[UPDATE : This week the Minnesota Supreme Court denied the petition for review of the Murrin v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 12:22 pm
There has been some push back in the courts to limit the scope of this legislation, most recently in New York with the federal appellate judge ruling in Stratton v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 2:10 pm
We look forward to litigating back in the lower court, making it clear that Internet backbone spying is unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
In State of South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Judge Newman leans back in his chair, visibly frustrated by the response. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:52 am
" The case, Arizona v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 11:44 am
The Utah Appellate court reversed and remanded back to the trial court finding that the grandparents had not presented sufficient evidence to overcome the compelling interest of the state that is narrowly construed (“tailored”) in favor of the fundamental right of the actual parent. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:07 am
” State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 3:20 am
The US Supreme Court case Carpenter v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:42 am
The Appellate Division said that his complaint should be dismissed for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
See, e. g., United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
You can now state openly what you though all along - that it's safe and effective to cure Alzheimers. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Dudley-Barton v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Dudley-Barton v. [read post]
