Search for: "State v. C. G. B." Results 2001 - 2020 of 2,352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm by Zoe Verni
I like the question, “what does a university attorney do,” because the answer is everything from A to Z: A is for antitrust, affirmative action, and athletics; B is for bankruptcy; C is for COVID-19, construction, copyright, and contracts; D is for discrimination; E is for environmental law, ethics, and encampments; F is for financial aid; G is for grievances; … and Z is for zoning. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
Since meter readers enter premises with some form of acquiescence or permission arising through the landowner's contract with SCE & G, they are not trespassers. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Bombardier Aerospace Training Center) c. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Lisette Mustert
The EDPS here referred to the judgment in Case C-70/88 Parliament v Commission, which held that the Court must ‘be able to maintain the institutional balance and, consequently, review the observance of the Parliament’s prerogatives when called upon to do so […] by means of a legal remedy’ (para. 23). [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 4:36 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Síndico: la Junta de Control, con las excepciones indicadas en la sección 926 del título 11 del United States Code. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:14 am by Raymond McKenzie
  (c) The firm’s ownership by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals must be real, substantial, and continuing, going beyond pro forma ownership of the firm as reflected in ownership documents. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Eventually, the employee received a Record of Employment from 260 stating that she was employed from November 6, 2017 to December 13, 2017. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Eventually, the employee received a Record of Employment from 260 stating that she was employed from November 6, 2017 to December 13, 2017. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 am by DaytonDUI
”  This flirts with overturning the 1984 Ohio Supreme Court ruling in State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Along with this, courts also consider several additional factors: (a) whether the one performing services is engaged in a distinct occupation or business; (b) the kind of occupation, with reference to whether, in the locality, the work is usually done under the direction of the principal or by a specialist without supervision; (c) the skill required in the particular occupation; (d) whether the principal or the worker supplies the instrumentalities, tools, and the place of work for… [read post]