Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 27,215
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2008, 9:12 pm
Code Sec. 82.007(a). [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:25 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 11:05 am
Code § 17200. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:05 am
Code § 401, stating that `the most troubling part’ was that Prince continued using his phone despite Kasulones's instruction to stop. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 10:00 pm
” Hepatitis A outbreak count holding steadyAlso on Monday, state officials began a week of public hearings regarding proposed changes to Hawaii’s food safety codes. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 9:08 am
Va Code Ann. 54.1-111. [read post]
CarCheckup Alleges Infringement by CarMD.com and Innova Electronics of Patented Vehicle Code Readers
25 Jul 2013, 11:59 am
In its ruling in Uniloc v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:00 am
The recent decision by the Texas Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Houston in Harris County Appraisal District v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:13 am
’ [Texas Penal Code]§ 42.07(b)(3). [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:22 am
State Comptroller DiNapoli proposes legislation providing for the forfeiture of pension benefits of members guilty of “Abuse of Public Trust”Source: Office of the State ComptrollerState Comptroller Thomas P. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Code § 636(b), the Court referred all pretrial matters in this case to United States Magistrate Judge Nannette A. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:40 am
The Court of Appeal relied on the statutory language of Sec. 3295(c), which expressly states that a pretrial punitive damage discovery determination "shall not be considered to be a determination on the merits of the claim. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 9:06 am
Berzon specified that the case, Progressive Democrats for Social Justice v. [read post]
States Support Plaintiffs Lawsuit that Prop 65 Warning for Products Containing Glyphosate Violates F
8 Jan 2018, 7:25 pm
See Zauderer v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:35 pm
According to Orchid, “Roche’s use codes do not accurately describe the patented methods of use found in the claims of the 634 and 957 patents, in that they state that the 634 and 957 patent claims cover prevention of osteoporosis,” and “Roche must correct the use code for the 634 patent . . . [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 12:53 pm
The New Mexico Supreme Court ruled in City of Las Cruces v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:58 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:19 am
Supreme Court's decision today in Ashcroft v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
Sweet Home Chapter of Communities, the Court distinguished its previous decision in United States v. [read post]
