Search for: "State v. Country" Results 2001 - 2020 of 26,678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Your case is dismissed under Rooker-Feldman and Younger *and* Heck v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 10:05 am by David Klein
Last month, a magistrate judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida issued an informative report and recommendation in Zononi v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 9:00 am by Picl Guest Blogger
High-risk zones start with the letters A or V, while low-to-moderate risk zones include zones B, C, and X. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 7:24 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
This same pattern of prosecution of public health policies and resolutions adverse to collective health was repeated in Uruguay, Brazil, and other countries in the region. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 10:15 am by Guest Contributor
A decision from an appeals court in the case of the Institute of Amazonian Studies against the Brazilian State (IEA v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 5:43 am by Dennis Crouch
In addition, the European Union, along with the United States and others, is currently involved in a dispute at the World Trade Organization (WTO) over China’s ASI procedures in these cases (a detailed discussion of China’s ASI landscape can be found here). [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 8:59 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
Recently, a Federal Judge in Pennsylvania decided a Motion To Dismiss in favor of the Government in the case of United States v American Health, et al. [read post]
The contracts also included FAR 52.229-6, Taxes-Foreign Fixed Price Contracts, which states that the contract price shall be increased by the amount of any after-imposed tax the contractor is required to pay. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:05 am by Ashley Morgan
In this article, we will focus on Medicare Advantage SIU audits and provide examples of what we have been seeing around the country. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:44 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Buchanan One of the safest bets in recent years was that Republicans would conveniently drop the pretense that they believe in states' rights as soon as their manufactured Supreme Court super-majority handed them their long-sought repeal of Roe v. [read post]