Search for: "State v. German" Results 2001 - 2020 of 3,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2015, 8:37 am by Andres
EnergieAgentur, the German Energy Agency published the pictures on its website without authorisation. [read post]
15 Oct 2006, 3:04 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 2:11 pm
On October 31, 2007, Judge Cacheris of the Eastern District of Virginia held court in the case of Tafas v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:07 pm
”The ambiguous drafting of Article 11 together with the above was enough for the German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) to decide in Case I ZR 126/06 Gebäckpresse II that the event of disclosure relied on as qualifying for a UCD must take place within the territory of the EU. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 11:34 am
In Michael Toth v Emirates [2011] EWPCC 18, 13 June 2011.) [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
In this context, the market in question could not simply be defined by reference to the market for products sold under the REGURIN trade mark -- such a definition was entirely self-fulfilling and failed to satisfy the underlying principles of free trade between Member States [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:17 am by Florian Mueller
Robart, clearly a thought leader and pioneer among U.S. federal judges with respect to FRAND, in the Microsoft v. [read post]
In our 2011 ACLU report on secrecy "Drastic Measures Required," my co-author Mike German and I wrote that "American democracy has a disease, and it's called secrecy. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:43 am by Florian Mueller
Besides the import ban it won last year, it also obtained three German patent injunctions against Motorola's Android devices (1, 2, 3), the first one of which has already been affirmed by an appeals court. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:58 am by INFORRM
It tried a similar approach in Canada in what is by now quite a well-known case, Google v Equustek. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
shape) discussed before French court (Class 46)   Germany German Bundestag meets innovation (IP:JUR) Bundesgerichtshof – comparison of (composite) marks: MIXI (Class 46)   Hungary Is it worth bothering if all you get is Hungary? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
shape) discussed before French court (Class 46) Germany German Bundestag meets innovation (IP:JUR) Bundesgerichtshof – comparison of (composite) marks: MIXI (Class 46) Hungary Is it worth bothering if all you get is Hungary? [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]