Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 29,345
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2023, 11:21 am
Kisor leans heavily, in its analysis, both on Chevron itself and on later opinions about the Chevron test, such as United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Our study sheds light on the regulatory efficacy of comment letters in the context of executive compensation. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:17 am
Sywula v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Illinois, an 1873 decision upholding a state’s right to exclude women from the practice of law. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:12 am
Manohar Reddy and Another v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
United States Texas State Representative, Giovanni Capriglione, introduced a privacy bill to the state legislature which closely follows the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 8:09 am
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 6:10 pm
Similarly, Revitz v. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 5:14 am
PanamaSilva v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
Recognized analogous grounds under section 15(1) include sexual orientation (Egan v Canada), citizenship status (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia), and marital status (Miron v Trudel). [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:13 am
The Associated Press reports here on the aftermath of Ramirez v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
United States) and the other (Bolling v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, some state officials banned the consideration of social or political interests when making investment decisions for state pension funds or have redirected state funds away from large asset managers because these officials claim the companies are prioritising political and social agendas over duties to clients. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:16 pm
A light breakfast of coffee and pastries will be provided. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:16 am
Colorado and Buck v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:36 am
The Fifth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 8:16 pm
See also Dred Scott v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
On 7 February 2023, President Joe Biden gave his 2023 State of the Union Address. [read post]