Search for: "State v. Light" Results 2001 - 2020 of 29,345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2023, 11:21 am by Corbin K. Barthold
Kisor leans heavily, in its analysis, both on Chevron itself and on later opinions about the Chevron test, such as United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Our study sheds light on the regulatory efficacy of comment letters in the context of executive compensation. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by GSU Law Student
Illinois, an 1873 decision upholding a state’s right to exclude women from the practice of law. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Texas State Representative, Giovanni Capriglione, introduced a privacy bill to the state legislature which closely follows the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 8:09 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
Recognized analogous grounds under section 15(1) include sexual orientation (Egan v Canada), citizenship status (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia), and marital status (Miron v Trudel). [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:13 am by Jeff Welty
The Associated Press reports here on the aftermath of Ramirez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
For example, some state officials banned the consideration of social or political interests when making investment decisions for state pension funds or have redirected state funds away from large asset managers because these officials claim the companies are prioritising political and social agendas over duties to clients. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]