Search for: "State v. Little Bear" Results 2001 - 2020 of 2,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am by Eugene Volokh
The government bears the burden to show that less restrictive means would not be as effective…. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
To be fair to the Telegraph, an in-house blogger has argued since the original story that the HRA had little bearing on the Chindamo case, but she missed the central point: that Chindamo’s right to family life argument was secondary to his main case, and if he had lost on that point he would still have won the appeal. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Proponents of the amendment have framed the issue as a response to income inequality, with the surtax advertised as only affecting the wealthiest residents of the Bay State and thus ensuring that the wealthy pay their fair share. [1] This motivation is unsurprising in a state known for its progressive politics, and the Commonwealth’s flat-rate income tax is anomalous in a tax code that otherwise bears the hallmarks of progressive taxation. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:36 pm
  It is therefore ICBC that bears the burden of proving that Mr. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am by Marty Lederman
 Petitioners also state that separate "insurance cards" are necessary. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (I’m not sure this is true, as a property teacher who recently taught State v. [read post]