Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 2001 - 2020
of 51,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
But it’s worth noting that even in mid-February, we have a pair of cases still hanging around from the end-of-summer long conference and on their 11th relists. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
§ 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court in violation of Woodford v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 12:09 pm
The result in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm
In the case Batson v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:57 am
State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:55 am
Brandt To better understand the current status of grandparent visitation in the state, we need to discuss a case called Moriarty v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:55 am
Brandt To better understand the current status of grandparent visitation in the state, we need to discuss a case called Moriarty v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 8:11 pm
" In U.S. ex rel Davis v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 8:06 am
Cantor v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:42 pm
It's taken that long, and consumed that many resources, just to get the case in front of the California Supreme Court.To try again would only generate another decades-long morass.Just finish it. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:15 pm
That rule has long applied to virtually all heterosexual marriages. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 10:43 am
From today's opinion in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:02 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:40 pm
" United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
However, in Rucho v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 6:05 am
So long as states do not drop below a national floor, they can pursue different approaches. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:13 am
Nevertheless, she asserted that “[t]here’s no time limit, how long I can stay with my child here in the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:24 pm
Indeed, in its last public trust/State title case, Phillips Petroleum v. [read post]
