Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 19,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Defense Attorney: Mark D. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:26 am
State Law Claims. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 9:03 am
In the trademark opposition case, Halo Trademarks Limited v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 9:03 am
In the trademark opposition case, Halo Trademarks Limited v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:18 am
As the Supreme Court itself noted, there was a marked trend in state legislatures 'toward liberalization of abortion statutes.' That movement for legislative change ran parallel to another law revision effort then underway — the change from fault to no-fault divorce regimes, a reform that swept through the state legislatures and captured all of them by the mid-1980s. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 11:17 am
The abstract is: Commentators and counsel agree that Abaclat v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
My colleague Jack Van Valkenburgh is taking a break from his labors after 18 years of nurturing civil liberties in the arid soil of my home state. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:16 am
In essence, the General Court stated that Roshen failed to prove that the goods in question were actually sold and known under that mark during the Imperial or Soviet era in the Baltic States or Poland, this because the evidence relied upon by Roshen only related to Soviet Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
In doing so, the Court had this to say about Concepcion: We invited the parties to provide their comments on the recent United States Supreme Court case, AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:38 am
In the Interflora case, part of the allegation of trade mark infringement was that Marks & Spencer did not employ negative matching when using, among other words and generic terms, the keyword which also constituted its trade mark Interflora. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 10:01 pm
Today marks the 34th anniversary of the decision in Roe v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 5:15 am
We are examining the reasoning in Sutherland v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 11:47 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 10:42 am
Little V. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 3:15 am
Unique Motorcars v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 4:46 am
The first case, United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 3:15 am
Eva’s Bridal Ltd. v. [read post]
