Search for: "State v. Sales" Results 2001 - 2020 of 20,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 11:10 am by N. Peter Rasmussen
Similarly, the fact that some investors may have liquidated covered securities in their retirement accounts to fund their Stanford investments was not determinative, because these sales were not a necessary part of the fraud.Roland v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
 Once a particular transaction is labeled a ‘service,’ as opposed to a ‘sale’ of a ‘product,’ it is outside the purview of our product liability statute”); Zelle v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:45 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:20 am by Dave
A parallel doctrine applies in the patent context, so you can expect citations to Kirtsaeng v. [read post]