Search for: "State v. Taylor " Results 2001 - 2020 of 3,341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2016, 2:59 am by Ben
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:56 am by SHG
S. ___ (2015) (per curiam); Taylor v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Howell Williams, Western Connecticut State University, “Workers Built Danbury: Deindustrialized Memory in a Hatting Town”Josh Kluever, Binghamton University (SUNY), “Sorry Waldman, We Just Couldn’t Help It: Socialist State Legislators in New York, 1912-1922”CARCERAL STATE, CARCERAL SOCIETYModerator: Elizabeth Hinton, Yale University Panelists: Max Felker-Kantor, Ball State University, “Arresting the Demand for Drugs: DARE… [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 6:57 pm by Glenn R. Reiser
This was not the first time the Court confronted this issue, for 10 years earlier in Taylor v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 9:52 am by HRWatchdog
Taylor Jr. of Horvitz Levy LLP, the CalChamber joined the U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
**   * The decision notes that City "presented ample evidence that it passed the 2010 Ordinance only after pursuing a range of measures to increase revenue and cut expenses" and although New York law permitted the City to require the appellants to contribute up to 50 percent of the premium amount, the 2010 Ordinance required the Retirees to contribute substantially less.** In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, Ct. of Appeals, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of Appeals ruled that in… [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:08 am
  Claire Methven O'Brien and I are delighted to announce that Human Rights Due Diligence Laws: From Due Diligence Standards to New Legal Norms will be published by Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group) in their Globalization: Law and Policy Series. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:25 am by Edward Foley
But if Hobbs doesn't win, Democratic voters would rather have Taylor Robson than Lake, and given that almost half Republican voters also preferred Taylor Robson to Lake, it seems undoubtedly true that a majority of all the state's voters would want Taylor Robson rather than Lake to become the state's governor. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:55 am by Steve Kalar
It does to Judge Kleinfeld (left) in a new categorical analysis decision, United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]