Search for: "State v. White" Results 2001 - 2020 of 11,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2018, 7:29 am by Tom Smith
Bush’s White House, which argued that race should not be a significant factor. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 7:51 am by Dan Farber
To keep control of the Senate, Democrats must hold on to the White House and two Senate seats in red states. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 11:08 am
Individual rather than the court responsible for identifying the "cause of action"Zimmer v Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket #08-1590, October 22, 2008 [not precedential]Lawrence Zimmer appealed an order by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, that dismissed his employment discrimination complaint "for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:31 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rakib, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 870 (01 April 2011) Adam & Anor, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 865 (01 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Owens v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 359 (31 March 2011) Haresign v Clydesdale Bank Plc (t/a Yorkshire Bank) [2011] EWCA Civ 344 (01 April 2011) Eliassen & Anor v Eliassen & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 361 (01 April 2011) Chater, R (on the application of)… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm by NL
Quadrant Brownswood Tenant Cooperative Limited v White (HC 09 C 03494) - an Art 8 challenge to a housing co-op possession claim - was due to be heard on 9 November 2010, but has been adjourned to some date after 4 January 2011. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm by NL
Quadrant Brownswood Tenant Cooperative Limited v White (HC 09 C 03494) - an Art 8 challenge to a housing co-op possession claim - was due to be heard on 9 November 2010, but has been adjourned to some date after 4 January 2011. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
President Trump has since stated that “only time will tell” who will be in the White House come January 2020. [read post]