Search for: "Stephens v. State"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 6,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2015, 8:20 am
He clerked for Justice Stephen G. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
Heller and in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
Caulkett and Bank of America v. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 6:59 am
Stephens. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
Stephens, 135 S. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:10 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 6:49 am
In In Re Stephen W. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:25 am
The case cite is Adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:39 am
United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:41 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Hoye v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:22 pm
Elms v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:15 am
In Edgar v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 10:58 am
” The Act states that the signature may be an electronic signature. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 9:30 pm
His book, M’Culloch v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:46 am
Other courts in other States seen to equate no-hire clauses with more restrictive covenants.The case is CMGRP, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:32 am
Along similar lines, Justice Stephen Breyer worried about the consequences of extending the void-for-vagueness doctrine into the civil context. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
” At the National Council of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Nelson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:11 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Guam v. [read post]
