Search for: "THOMAS v. US GOVERNMENT" Results 2001 - 2020 of 5,530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2019, 10:00 am by David Kopel and Randy Barnett
” In short, as Thomas stated in his dissent from the denial of certioriari in Silvester v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:34 am by Chris Attig
The Federal Circuit used strong language in affirming the decision of the Veterans Court. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Thomas, though, has stated that view as a dissenter, most notably in the 2002 decision in Harris v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Panopticon blog reports on the argument in the US Supreme Court case of Spokeo Inc v Thomas Robins, a case which concerns the issue as to whether there should be compensation for “digital injury” where there is no financial loss. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Thomas with opinion in Parker Drilling v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am by pscamp01
 The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am by pscamp01
 The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by Steven Boutwell
The Court’s Rejection of the Physical Presence Rule in Quill Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the court; writing for a majority that included Justices Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, and Gorsuch.[8]  Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 8:39 am by Maya Angenot
Noting that most people in the United States today use cellphones, the Court rightly noted that “people do not buy cell phones to serve as tracking devices or reasonably expect them to be used by government in that way”. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
The majority stuck with Marsh, leaving us with a pro-religion government prayer jurisprudence.Kavanaugh’s pre-judge briefs were pro-public religion. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am by Orin Kerr
Thomas, 2009 WL 2054145 (Ohio App. 8 Dist. 2009); State v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
I have been absolutely swamped at work so it's been a little difficult to find time to analyze the Salazar v. [read post]