Search for: "Talent v. Talent"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 2,025
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2007, 10:24 pm
Therefore, the top talent they pay for may not necessarily translate over into equal quality work for months. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
If they functioned the way the cost-plus crowd hypothesizes, I could afford my own Gulfstream V, Provence villa, and 5-bedroom penthouse with Central Park views: After all, I just increased my "costs," so the workings of the market would appropriately subsidize me on the wage side, right? [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
It's a blow for Libby's two talented defense lawyers: Theodore V. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:01 am
[5] See id.; See also Case 36-74, Walrave and Koch v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 4:19 pm
This programme has suddenly become much more exciting, now that Mr Justice Pumfrey has given his sparklingly exciting judgment in SanDisk v Sisvel, on which IPKat co-bloggie Jeremy will be saying some choice words.Above: the battle of IP rights and competition rules has a distinct flavour of snakes and ladders about it (artwork here from the talented brand-savvy Carolyn Morgan's weblog) [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:27 pm
Clement at the podium, was it even intimated that the Court should consider throwing out entirely the four-decades-old precedent in Flast v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:02 pm
In Circuit City v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:52 pm
Jefferson--my favorite president in US History.Eric Muller posted a "cool" letter he found relating to the Gibbons v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:24 am
Before one joins wholesale with the Chief Justice's crusade for cash, it is imperative to further examine whether or not the judiciary is truly losing out on real talent as he claims. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 12:12 am
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
February 5, 2007Re: The Preternaturally Prolific Posner on Plagiarism.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 4:14 am
Partners v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 1:33 pm
Click here to read the published opinion in Wagner v Columbia Pictures: Wagner v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
-based firms, saying the market for talent had changed. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 8:38 am
Call it Greenhouse v. [read post]
23 Dec 2006, 10:50 am
ESTAuburn Tigers (10) v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 3:55 pm
The cover story, by talented Allen & Overy triumvirate Nicola Dagg, Philip Mansfield and Mark Ridgeway, is all about the interplay between patent law (which creates monopolies), competition law (which neuters them, if you're unlucky) and technical standards (which force monopolies open by decreeing them essential for everyone to use). [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 6:44 am
In O.T. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 7:02 am
Merci beaucoup, FrédéricThe IPKat posted a comment last week on Magna Doodle v Magna Pro. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 11:25 am
You have two tier law firms, designed to make better use of a firm's talents. [read post]
