Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 2001 - 2020 of 21,973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Plaintiff Rhythm observed that the parties once discussed settlement, including an offer and counter offer which were rejected, but there was no outstanding proposal. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
If the judge strikes down the divorce request, the plaintiff's attorney said he will likely appeal to the Indiana Court of Appeals. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 8:23 pm
Pa. 2008) In this breach of contract case, plaintiff Rhoads Industries, inadvertently produced over eight hundred privileged, electronic documents. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 2:31 am
 First, and most importantly, the substantial similarity test in all cases considers only the qualitative and quantitative significance of the copied portion in relation to the plaintiff’s work as a whole. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:42 am by Steven Cohen
  The plaintiff also alleges that a lack of testing does not render his testimony as inadmissible. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 10:28 am by Alex Talarides
The parties had disputed what standard of review the Court of Chancery should apply: the Revlon test, as plaintiffs claimed, because Volcano’s stockholders received cash for their shares, or the irrebuttable business judgment rule, as defendants argued, because Volcano’s stockholders were “fully informed, uncoerced, and disinterested” when they approved the merger by tendering a majority of Volacano’s shares into a tender offer. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 12:35 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
 At the time, a test had been completed showing a different disability level, but the results of that test were not factored into the award. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:20 am by Howard Friedman
The Diocese moved for summary judgment claiming that the "ministerial exception" doctrine precludes plaintiffs' lawsuit. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:07 am by Docket Navigator
[A]fter the jury returned a verdict, but before final judgment, the Supreme Court determined that the Federal Circuit’s two-part test for enhanced damages was inconsistent with 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The court held that under Arizona's Free Exercise of Religion Act, the school had not shown that it met the compelling interest/ least restrictive means test. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
§ 1681(a)(3)—is substantially related to the government’s objective of accommodating religious exercise.The court rejected plaintiffs' Establishment Clause challenge applying the Lemon test. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:28 am by Allan Blutstein
Okla.) -- holding that agency’s belated response to plaintiff’s request warranted no after-the-fact remedy, and that the agency demonstrated the adequacy of its search. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Therefore, regardless of what test is applied, there is no nonreligious assembly or institution similarly situated that is being treated better than Plaintiff. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 10:57 am
you gave him.The district court denied your anti-SLAPP motion, holding that the motion didn't satisfy the first part of the two-part test (i.e., that the cause of action didn't rise out of your First Amendment rights). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by Docket Navigator
The court denied defendant's motion for summary judgment that plaintiff was estopped from asserting noninfringement under the patent marking estoppel doctrine. [read post]