Search for: "UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY v. State" Results 2001 - 2020 of 2,031
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am by Roshonda Scipio
(RES) TZ 2 SP33 2011 Civil Rights With all deliberate speed : implementing Brown v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am by Mandelman
  So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of  the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:17 am by Hannah Kris
Think Brookings—one of the most influential, most quoted and most trusted think tanks! [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Compared to the rest of the world, the United States does not have a unique problem with tax evasion. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
.  A2190 Bacalles -- Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided by the county or city of New York to such non-indigent prisoners while in prisonSUMM : Amd SS500-h, 500-n & 508, Cor L Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided to them by the county or city of New York while such non-indigent prisoners are in prison. 01/16/07 referred to correction LAW / CORRECTNSA2228 Lafayette (MS) -- Provides for the… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am by Chris Attig
  An attorney who has practiced 3 decades before several Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal, including the United States Supreme Court, summed up the experience of working appeals with the VA Office of General Counsel: “They are petty and arrogant and vindictive – young lawyers whose bosses have never taught them how to carry themselves like professionals. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am by Chris Attig
  An attorney who has practiced 3 decades before several Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal, including the United States Supreme Court, summed up the experience of working appeals with the VA Office of General Counsel: “They are petty and arrogant and vindictive – young lawyers whose bosses have never taught them how to carry themselves like professionals. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 12:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Motorola Mobility appealed this order, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hold a hearing on Tuesday, September 11.The Daubert motions are all about what the FRAND royalty rate should be, not about injunctive relief per se. [read post]
14 May 2010, 12:07 am by Michael Geist
  It matters because I live in a city with a strong connection to the digital economy and we need forward-looking laws to allow the next generation of companies to thrive. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:31 am
  Led by the United States, several countries around the world have established fair use provisions within their copyright laws (Israel being the most recent). [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:19 am by Steven Boutwell
Under current law, a business concern may include individual, proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company, corporation, joint venture (so long as there is no more than 49% participation by a foreign business entities), association, trust, or cooperative. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 12:18 pm by Suraj Vyas
The point of crypto is that it doesn’t require trust. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:54 pm
  You read the subject line and learn that the fax relates to a huge proposal your company recently submitted. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]