Search for: "UNITED STATES v. FLORIDA" Results 2001 - 2020 of 6,508
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Matal, and Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 10:00 pm
McClary, Case No. 16-15794 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and can be read here. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 11:17 am by David Strifling
” While the government has stayed on the sidelines in Florida v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
New Mexico and Colorado for this blog, and Lara Fowler does the same for the argument in Florida v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:11 pm by Lara Fowler
Edwin Kneedler, deputy solicitor general, argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information, and Cyan v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In contrast to the Tree Top Court’s unwillingness to infer an implied demand, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, in Scottsdale Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
(Complaint, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, 17-CV-62345) the SEC charged  Joseph A. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
Naccarato (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, 17-CV-24682-JLK), the SEC alleged that in September 2013, California-based attorney Owen H. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
As Professors Elizabeth Rowe and Daniel Mahfood at University of Florida explained in their pre-DTSA article, there were two main challenges when it came to using state trade secret law to reach out-of-state conduct. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Here’s the intro: On December 5, 2017, Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida held in SEC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a case the justices will consider next week that asks whether a driver has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a rental car when he is not an authorized driver, noting that “it is not obvious that people who drive cars that others have rented should forfeit their Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]