Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 9,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2011, 10:31 pm
See Branzburg v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:02 am
In Matter of Kinderhook Development, LLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:02 am
In Matter of Kinderhook Development, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
Considering the existing framework for the mutual recognition and enforcement of criminal decisions, the ECtHR decided to shift the burden of proof on the defendant. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
’s Office v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:33 pm
Applying United States v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:11 pm
He practiced primarily in the metro-Atlanta area, and specialized in “family law, international family law, and Hague Abduction Convention work in the United States,” and he “served as an expert witness on Hague Abduction Convention matters. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm
” Cohen v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:35 am
Two weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court decided to hear another patent case[1] – marking only the ninth time during the Chief Justice Roberts era that Court has decided to do so. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
He had, after all, the burden of establishing that the s. 6(a) exception applied here. [read post]
29 May 2023, 6:29 am
The United States District Court, District of Oregon, (the “Court”) heard argument on Plaintiff’s motion. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 1:14 pm
” See United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:29 pm
United States (1968) 391 U.S. 123, 128-136 (Bruton).) [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm
Precedent from the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:42 am
Federbush was a citizen of the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
The unanimity of the justices was matched, to an unusual degree, by unanimity among the States and Central government (appearing as interveners in the hearing), whose Solicitors-General ‘grasped the nettle and decided to present a united front’ in seeking a new approach.[2]The decision itself drew upon both existing disenchantment with orthodoxy (or the lack of any accepted interpretation) and upon scholarly critiques, particularly those of Michael Coper (who appeared… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 7:10 am
., to Turkey, and the enforcement of court-ordered visitation so long as the children remained in the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:31 pm
In Couch v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has established the right to know one’s children as a fundamental Constitutional right. [read post]
