Search for: "United States v. Marshall" Results 2001 - 2020 of 2,250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm by John Malcolm
These subpoenas — born, one suspects, out of enmity for this president — implicate important issues of separation of powers and federalism, including: the legitimate scope of congressional oversight; the ability of a state prosecutor to investigate and possibly indict a sitting president; whether United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
(Reexamination Alert) Recapture doctrine before the CAFC: In re Mostafazedeh (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D New York: Patentee’s ‘sufficiently plausible’ belief as to the scope of patents negates intent to deceive necessary for false marking claim: Max Impact v Sherwood Group (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas – Marshall jury verdict for plaintiff; invalidity rejected even under ‘preponderance’… [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm by Laurence Tribe
  As Chief Justice Margaret Marshall explained on behalf of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in Goodridge v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:15 pm
No question was raised as to petitioner's loyalty to the United States. . . . [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:28 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case was Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 5:00 am by Kevin
Those of us in the United States, Liberia, and Myanmar would like an answer too, please. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am by Alfred Brophy
  What does Invisible Man say about the culture of the United States on the eve of Brown? [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
As the late Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Antonin Scalia once remarked, Marshall [the first black member of the U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 7:34 am by Zak Gowen
Mastercard Moves to Ban Cannabis Purchases on Its Debit CardsReuters – July 26, 2023 Mastercard (MA.N) has told financial institutions to stop allowing marijuana transactions on its debit cards, dealing a blow to an industry already on the fringes of the financial system in the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The starting point in that cycle was the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 12:47 pm by Marcia Coyle
Roberts explained the political question doctrine in this way: "Chief Justice Marshall famously wrote that it is 'the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.' (Marbury v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:24 am
Justice Jackson made this point in a barb at Justice Frankfurter in West Virginia State Bd of Educ. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:55 am by jonathanturley
The United States for the Eleventh Circuit rejected this use of a statistical study without evidence that racism played a role in the specific case under review. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 8:28 am by David Bernstein
To take an example from American constitutional history, Justice John Marshall Harlan heroically stood up for the rights of African Americans in a series of famous dissents, most prominently in Plessy v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]